|
|
Post by Hardcase on Apr 26, 2007 19:11:38 GMT -5
Just curious. I like to read from different versions I think it helps my understanding.
|
|
|
|
Post by clinton on May 1, 2007 8:05:21 GMT -5
I prefer the King James version.
When I read the other versions I find the message to be watered down many times.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hardcase on May 1, 2007 20:10:08 GMT -5
I like the New King James version, but that's about as far as I go.  |
|
pawclaws
Fork
A Face Only A Mother Could Love
Posts: 26
|
Post by pawclaws on May 15, 2007 6:41:45 GMT -5
|
|
pawclaws
Fork
A Face Only A Mother Could Love
Posts: 26
|
Post by pawclaws on Feb 27, 2008 8:45:04 GMT -5
Won't be much longer and Pastor Feddie Hill will have the entire Bible transcribed to Ohio Camp Cooks!  Maybe we'll have a smokey Dutch oven version!  |
|
|
|
Post by Josh A on Feb 27, 2008 9:48:07 GMT -5
Mostly the New King James Version, but with technology now days I do alot of reading on the computer and on web hosted bible programs like www.biblegateway.com . Then I can quickly flip from one version to another. I like to read from "The Message" version, I think it puts it in a more modern day wording. But the one I am really just starting to use is the NASB. I am told it is suppose to be the most accurate translation of the original language. Another site I have found to be very helpfull in studying is www.eliyah.com/lexicon.html . It has a complete Strong's Concordance online along with a Easton's Bible Dictionary and several other references. It has been a great tool for me so far. If you like to really study the bible you have to have a good concordance and dictionary. |
|
|
|
Post by Josh A on Feb 27, 2008 9:51:24 GMT -5
I might also add that www.eliyah.com/lexicon.html also has a very easy to use scripture search tools to look up any verse and they have about any translation you want to read it in. |
|
|
|
Post by Schrader on Feb 27, 2008 11:05:09 GMT -5
NASB for me...its a study bible, so it has a concordance and commentators.
Schrader
|
|
